Francine Prose discusses literature and complains about the
complexity of the reading skills of high school students. The subject of her
piece of literature is the education curriculum about English. She bases her
argument from evidence she gathered from high school reading lists, and quotes
from intelligent professionals. The article was published during the September
of 1999, on Harper’s magazine. This
magazine was famous at the time, and a lot of people read it. Prose wanted
people to read her viewpoints, and understand what is wrong with the high
school curriculum. Even though the article was published in a magazine and any
person could read it, the main and intended audience was English teachers.
Prose hoped that English schoolteachers would understand her and therefore
change their curriculum of teaching. Her purpose of writing this is to inform
and to persuade the people. The speaker is Francine Prose. She believes, and proves with evidence that the
curriculum now is wrong, and persuades them to take action. Throughout her
essay, her tone is critical, informative, persuasive, superior, and
professional. She knows and believes that her point of view is right, but does
not directly criticize. Prose writes professionally, making her more
believable.
SOAPST makes it easy for the reader to understand a piece of
literature. All the things are laid out for them, making it easy for the reader
to dig deep into the piece, examining all the important parts. This allows the
person to not have to reread the piece over and over, but instead look at the
SOAPST they created. Due to Prose’s professional and persuasive tone, her
article was effective.
Prose did an amazing job with "I Know Why The Caged Bird Cannot Read" and I applaud her for criticizing the modern curriculum for English literacy. I hope that schoolteachers listen to what Prose has to say and take action to change this problem for the better. Davit, you explained each point with detail and your blog flowed through wonderfully. Prose's criticism in her piece was fun to read and you emphasized that properly.
ReplyDelete